I took notes during all the sessions I attended but only a few really caught my attention.
Dragon Slaying?
By far the most interesting session I went to was David White http://elgg.jiscemerge.org.uk/whited/ on the rather impressively titled ‘Cultural capital and community development in the pursuit of dragon slaying (Massively Multiplayer guild culture as a model for e-learning)’.
In World of Warcraft (WoW) http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/index.xml users gather together in guilds of around 25 people to complete tasks. These tasks are impossible to do alone so a guild must be formed in order to complete the tasks, which become progressively more difficult as the game goes on. During each task the guild members work together, each member with a specific role, and there is constant communication between the guild members. He argued that whilst he wasn’t advocating the use of WoW for learning, what was happening in the game were the kinds of things we wanted to encourage in e-learning.
Some of themes he touched on were -
Nexus of Multi-membership – we are all members of more than one community – school, work, football team….
No community exists in a single tool – in WoW the guilds organized themselves with website outside the game, used chat etc
He introduced the concept of Rhizomes vs Scaffolds? http://elgg.jiscemerge.org.uk/whited/weblog/598.html
He suggested that Multiple User Virtual Environments (MUVEs), such as Second Life http://secondlife.com , take some elements of WoW and can be used as a blank canvas.
He introduced his 10 musings on Second Life 10 Musings
The university campus already supports informal learning with bars, common rooms, clubs and societies etc
Some people are not interested in the social aspects and can work quite well without it. Although I think this raises the question of whether while the individual may be OK, the community is poorer without their involvement.
Whilst I found this session by a fellow ‘Emerger’ http://elgg.jiscemerge.org really interesting, I feel I must add a note of caution. Although I’m not Welsh, I did feel that, representing a Welsh University, I ought to have made some form of protest about dragon slaying being advocated at the conference J
Phoebe
http://phoebe-project.conted.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/trac.cgi
An online lesson planning toolkit
The presenter argued that the concept of the lesson is alien to HE so used the terms learning session or learning experience.
You can use anything to plan – pen & paper, mind maps, LAMS etc
Phoebe is designed to help ‘teachers’ with designing learning sessions or learning experiences and to be able to combine it with tools with which they are already familiar.
It has been used in staff development and for initial teacher training and may have other uses.
Whose e-learning is it anyway?
Talked about a mainly F2F module with a strong Blackboard presence.
The tutor had had a good experience with discussion boards but this had now decreased.
Maybe they were all in Facebook? Yes, the students had set up a facebook group which had social activity, support across year boundaries sharing and critical debate. The students felt free in facebook and the groups became like a community of practice.
The tutor was asked to join the facebook group and acted as a broker between facebook and blackboard. She checked facebook and brought the comments into the classroom.
She persuaded students to bring facebook posting into Blackboard.
Led to some issues –
The tutor was a young ‘facebook’ like person and was invited into the group. What about other tutors?
Without coaching in facebook what are students learning?
Is facebook divisive? Only 80% of the students were there.
Facebook is not very accessible
Should we ban or control facebook?
Should we ignore it?
Should we engage with it?
Could there be a facebook/VLE mash up?
Students seem to want a separate space for formal teaching.
No comments:
Post a Comment